|
Post by Cyan on Jun 16, 2021 16:41:32 GMT
first pile is what happened in past life "system lord" life and how to go forward.
|
|
|
Post by Cyan on Jun 18, 2021 9:09:20 GMT
That was an interesting and spot on reading.
Next.
Brazilian as "earlier menarch clearly has a later menopause".
|
|
|
Post by Cyan on Jun 18, 2021 9:19:16 GMT
Menarche later faction put up a good fight but there was no real contest.
So earlier menarche later menopause seems to win this one.
According to the study i read, the norwegian one, woman in 1960's had menarch at 13.4 or so and menopause at 43 or so, while 1940's had Menarch at 14 or so and menopause at 42. Which seems to indicate poor nutrition growing up delays and shortens fertile period. Since we cant test modern era due to no menopause we have to go with historical data.
Women in 1800's had menarch at 16-19 and menopaus at 35-40. So trend Seems to, indicate that nutrition + liberties + ? results in later menopause.
As current way to help women in fertility is to delay menopause, not neccesarily quicken menarche it is possible to delay meenopause somewhat by making menarch earlier but this results in a lesser "childhood" which is already under tremendous stress.
Next up.
Is it possible and beneficial to develop a chemical such as birth control to radically delay menopause and associated risk of birth defects.
|
|
|
Post by Cyan on Jun 18, 2021 9:20:38 GMT
Akiyama as "use chemical" and other guy as "if possible put menarch as low as possible."
|
|
|
Post by Cyan on Jun 18, 2021 10:18:23 GMT
Menarch lowering put a strong forward but there was no chance. Meaning that some form of chemical response is more desired. Since we are at "pretty much lowest point we can take menarch" perhaps it can be reduced by a few years but thats effect on menopause would not be on the range we need for menopause to be, perhaps, 55.
When i observe modern generation, menarch seems 6-9 ages and that leaves only a few years of "playtime" before actual puberty hits and that, from my view, is too little.
|
|
|
Post by Cyan on Jun 18, 2021 10:23:38 GMT
So based on field test modern generation seems to hold that fertility starts to decline at 30 instead of 25. so if 1940's and 1960's women hit menopause at 55 averaged and SERIOUS difficulty at 45 and decreasee by 25, these think that its 30, 50 and 60 respectively.
That seems to be ok.
Hmmm.
Nunes as trying to delay menopause is generally good and accepted by women as such or at least, need be acceptd as such.
|
|
|
Post by Cyan on Jun 18, 2021 10:23:55 GMT
Damnit edited to shit, new clip.
|
|
|
Post by Cyan on Jun 18, 2021 10:25:15 GMT
Mei as same goal.
|
|
|
Post by Cyan on Jun 18, 2021 10:49:15 GMT
Hmm.
Based on their postures and what i saw it seems women think that a earlier menopause (keeping it where it is) is an advantage on them, in the field of "if you cant talk to people younger than you how can you possibly understand kids" or "if you cant, its your loss" in a military sense instead of seeing older, non fertile, women as being "needing of help". At the same time the women seem to indicate that lengthening fertility age is not completely without faults as it is such a heavy proceess.
It comes down to "we see how you treat young people in how you treat us and that enables us to gauge how you would be with kids."
|
|
|
Post by Cyan on Jun 18, 2021 10:49:24 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Cyan on Jun 18, 2021 10:52:35 GMT
It seems a bit alien but both sides seem willing to accept it. If the women accept old guys going for younger women and men accept younger women going for older guys it can be crossed. I would still prefer that fertility does not end so soon for women but as it is not my form as such i am not in a positon to say.
|
|
|
Post by Cyan on Jun 18, 2021 10:53:54 GMT
One on left as "women accept that men date younger in general." if there is no acceptance of that then men, must, delay menopause by default so this is "so current model(tm), is ok then?"
|
|
|
Post by Cyan on Jun 18, 2021 11:38:20 GMT
Okay so delaying menopause is the way to go.
Rika as stick to Gall model for women and rest wll sort itself out, other as "despite disliked, study and implement chemical delay."
|
|
|
Post by Cyan on Jun 18, 2021 11:54:47 GMT
Hmmm.
So it seems after all is said and done that end of fertility and associated troubles are to be considered dis-ease and alleviated when possible. Societal large changes not recommended or supported, data on Menarche to Menopause inconclusive, so is pregnancys effect on menopause.
Predicting some increased attntion to allevviating this. Will keep an eye on.
|
|
|
Post by Cyan on Jun 20, 2021 13:07:14 GMT
Crowley as SSRI's for Schizo/long term "connect dots unconventially" disease(tm).
|
|